Wednesday, 6 April 2016

Da vinci code:





The narrative differences between three texts such as:

Genesis (The Bible)

The Paradise Lost (John Milton)

The Da Vinci Code (Dan Brown)





Genesis:

First thing came in front of us is that the narration is based on individual perception. People thinks differently when it goes through religion. Religion always kept by people. It is never considered on right path.



These are different point of views because it written by different writers. There is different ways of looking towards the religion or history. The individual narration is always connected with his or her own feelings, emotions, heritage, tradition, and atmosphere. So, there were more chances that narration surrounded with individual atmosphere.



The paradise lost:



God is at the center in Paradise lost. Human beings are nearer to the God. Milton is giving more space to human being in his narration. He is giving more conservative and argumentative nature to human being. The slight change here in Milton’s narration is that he tries to questioning God. So, questions are the beginning of knowledge and diminishing the ignorance and blind faith in God. It is challenging. But women's position still double marginalized in nature. They were portraying as the weakness of men.


Da vinci code:


The more changes come in the narration of Dan Brown. People blindly follow the religion while now people are in search of proving. God and human being are now in face to face or sometimes they overcome on God also. But Da Vinci Code is more nearer to human interest. It has the quality to grab the attention of human beings. It shows that woman has more space but not parallel to male. Women are inferior than male. It is more according to the people that what people like to see and watch. There is suspense, thriller and what not.




Monday, 14 March 2016

The Tiger smiled"





                      "The Tiger smiled"

Introduction

         Jim Corbett has expressed his experience on the natural , challenging place where he visited and came across with a dangerous problem. Then at live end he shares his personal feelings with successful and failed expressness.


            Jim is an experienced one to describe on the short story writing with very minute point.

                    "The Tiger smiled"  is a short story which provided the full description place with writer's own experience. Here we find where writer expresses his opinion and (ikings with his own activities at chograph, a hundred years along the path We went  to a ravine and decided to lake to the ravine. Folow it down to his junction with the village and pick up the path on the far side of the undergrowth.     


                Now, he starts with about story line where he saw at the spot from which the bird had risen and saw two eggs. As soon as he founded that these eggs, straw gloured with rich brown markings, were ofa most unusual shape, one being long and very pointed. While the other was as rounde as a marble asd as his collection lacked mghtjar eggs to add this odd clutch to it. So, cupping his eft hand he placed the eggs in it packed them sound with a little moss.

             As we write went down the banks becomes higher and sitly yards from where we had ewerd it come on a deep drop of some twelv to fourteen feet. Jim handed the rifle, after some time he come to know that the tigress followed him and other two men, who where with him to help them, after they left the open grounded. So, the three of them stood in a funch they had the smooth, steep rock behind us, to our right a wall of rock slightly equaning overthe raving fifteen feet high or fortly feet high.


                   At last, he short the tiger after such a long process of swingning with single hand and at last he gets success to kill a tiger. After three fail attempt and three more things each of which would oppear to been his disadvantage, were actually in his favour. These were-
The eggs in his left hand.
The light rifle he was cassying
The tiger being a man-eather

Conclusion
                Thus, at last he cut the tread of life who had cut the threads of sixty-four human lives and kept the eggs, at the safe place which replaced with different look, at last.         
            




The Saga of Tarungirl and seven old seekers

          The Saga of Tarungirl and seven old seekers



 Introductiona


           Manoj Das being a Indian writer given a picture of Indian personalities. The story "The saga of Tarungirl and seven friends own lives and their problems.

 Story line with seven friends:

             Story starts with "Merry Guys", over looking th egreen valley, violent gusts of freefe which tingled the hoizend faces of the seven old clubmen, snelled their loose coats and frushed their untidly monstaches.

 
                 There are seven seekers, friendly whose names are Mr. jekyl, Lall, Mr.Khanna, Tapan baba, Mishra, Meghananda and Tapan baba with other gentleman. Now story starts with the problems and sadness with retired judge, who become a poet later on and always joins metaphysical is  live current physical facts. Then it goes on with Khanna and Tapan and Lall joints to where they felt that they all are very sad and helpless from their early life or childhood.


               Now, they all got interested to meet and talk with tapan baba when they met, he was weeping and sobbing and the sobbing seven sprang up to their feel. After twenty years baba smiled, which become remarkable and here too so, all seven seekers demanded again to come out from the cave and to smile once again but he didn't come out and at lost Meghananda clarified. The businedd policy and reaveled that truth that other to sde or to cry is not entired his business nottring else, at last all friends understood the fact which is hidden and their attraction gone as they started to go away.

Conclusion


            At last, we can conclude that writer has provided a perfect scene and psychology of Indian people in the depiction of seven seekers, friends and one more point he has focused in the profession of saints so, called Baba's business monopoley.      

Learning skill



                          Learning skill 

         ”One must learn, how to learn”


   Learning is a skill which not only human being but every creature and animal purpose and this is the skill which help the learner to cultivate other skills. Then it’s a beautiful provoke its 


“You are never too old to learn”


     And therefore every single one should continue to learn till his last breath if you will stop learning then it will seas ways of your progress. Therefore one must have the use of learning new and interesting things but remember “Learning new, keep old”  


            There is also one thing this required of for a learner. To learn skill and that is the urge of learning. If the learner has this urge then he can learn so many new things without hesitation and therefore everyone must cultivate this urge of learning new things.
“The most important thing is do good to the person you are with”
    

Knowing your communication style



Knowing your communication style


             It happens many time that a presenter prepare his presentation from the first to last but he sometimes avoids to give required importance the chief aspects of presentation. Which is your style of communication it is not in for a just to know the way of his communication but he also should be aware of the strengths and weakness of his style.


       You need to analysis your all communication style weather it is…….
·     Unstructured or systematic
·     Formal or informal
·     Complex or simple
·     Indirect or direct
·     Emotional or natural
·     Time-focused or time flexible


          Keeping the said words in your mind try to analysis your communication style and ask others to help you evaluate communication style.


           Politeness is something that one to related that help anyone to relate with the audience directly. There are two types of politeness, according to the sociologist.
·     Positive politeness
·     Negative politeness   

Jonathan Swift a satirist



Jonathan Swift a satirist 


        Swift was born in a poor family having his mother or his sister as his father die seven months before his birth with regarding to swift’s childhood we don’t have much information. For ex- in 1673, swift attended the grammar school where in he developed the interest of studying literature. In the year 1682, he entered the college and was honored the degree of B.A. He latter on become a secretary for Sir William Temble. In the year 1692, he received in M.A and in 1702 he received the degree of a doctor.


His career

     From 1689 to 1694 was employed as a secretary in England. Later in the year 1699 he throughout all this time and especially often the year 1713 wherein he contrived writes satire in the form of both prose and poetry. This themes basically were different causes with regarded to politics, religion and civic.


 Major literary works

     Between the year 1696 and 1699 he wrote two major works “Tale of tub” and “Battle of books”. In the “Tale of a tub”, he defined the position of the Anglican churches and in “Battle of book”, he wrote about the ancient against moderns. In the year 1740, he continued to satire religion views and questions the process of knowledge acquisition in “The mechanical operation of the swift” In “Argument again abolishing Christianity” swift-talks about his reaction to the “Test act”. In his famous work “A modest proposal”(1729) he wrote about a reaction against the English commercial practices against tread. This is supposed to be one of his best works. In his next work, “The Draper’s letters” swift continued writing for the lives of their suppression by England. They were opposed greatly by the English people and for Treland. He becomes a national hero, this most famous book “Gulliver’s Travels” in the year 1726. He represents a satire on all aspects of humanity by kind into the weakness, views and flies in all human beings, “Gulliver’s Travels” basically adventure story involving several voyages of haul Gulliver, who because of his direction island living with people of unusual sizes, behaviors and philosophies. Book basically divided into four parts with each part lacing about a journey. It is a land mark satire on the English people and political system.

      It was in the year 1727 that he visited England for the last time and died in the year 1745 leaving all this belongings to charity.             
      

Write a note on the theory of laughter comedy

Write a note on the theory of laughter comedy
      


Introduction


          If I play gives us a pleasant feeling of life, we can undoubtly all it a comedy amusement and entertainment of comedy are usually lunged with laughter. Laughter may be caused by sheer buffoonery or fringed a sheered of sadness or reflection but comedy always lives by the laughter of audience.


             Criticizes like Pluto, Aristotle, Descartes, Hobbes, Hegel, spencer, Bergson and frayed have presented different theories of laughter. The first theory of laughter has been reconciled in Aristotle “Rhetoric” and that is a theory of incongruity produces a short of emotional; we face something different from what we excited and we laugh or smile for ex- A man cries for water and the servant brings a glass a water, but instead of given it to his master drinks it up, or talks the usual prow up:


“Man proposes god disposes”

“A comic would read”

“Man proposes wife disposes”        
          
 Some un expected reply or action is the sources of his comic in congruity.

            The second theory of laughter the theory is ludicrous is some difficult or agedness which is not painful. Here, the laughter aimed at somebody’s defect has barges put it,
“In laughter we always find an evoked intention to humiliate and consequently to correct are neighbors.”   


                
     But is it good meanness to laugh at those who are less fortuned than are self? Is it not down write prod? Yet, sari ten subjects have been expected. As harmless object of ridicules this theory suggest that we laugh it unfortunately or absurdity defect of other and we are thankful at are good luck. If a man is very fact, we burst into laughter at his side partly we are lucky in enough to escape such quietness. If we laugh at the steaming speech of the stage teacher, it is partly because we are lucky enough not to be abdicated in speech.     


       This theory advances comedy far behind the race of force and suggested the dissection or manners and charter. The follies, affectation absurdities and even the vices of mankind are held up to radical and strong. These types of comedy can laugh at new or strength types of dress, hair styles, affected ax sense of speech porosity of behavior and opines.   

         Another theory of laughter is spontaneous laughter such place as are enjoy us. Merry in them it content spontaneous laughter we laugh in imitation or by contentious rather than in superiority. A play may aim to make us share in a merry men that is reeling and minority, we a such a purpose comedy turns to sentiment or romance of fancy and response the enjoy of life rather than to the ridicules  of informality. 

        The source or laughter not always incorgulative , enjoy, fun, farce or scorn, we some time laugh in sorrow also very often we say do not know whether to laugh or to cry.      
 
           Thus, laughter may arise from a number of causes Walter of the opium that laughter upon the state of mind the audience.

Conclusion
           To some up one can say that comedy is the part and parcel of life if is one of the important genres of farm. This theory shows various methods of laughing and to enter tent. The reader or audience it provided bilges-quall movement to the reader for a while at list movement in this modern stressful era.    



Character sketch of "Ghashiram"






Character sketch of "Ghashiram"

            "Ghashiram kotwal" is written by Vijay Tendulkar in 1972. It is a Marathi play. Vijay Tendulkar is a Marathi writer. He wrote many famous stories in Marathi and 'Ghashiram Kotwal' is a one of his famous story. In this play he present a power of politics and how a man do anything for lust for a power. In this play main and central character is Ghashiram Savaldas.



             Ghashiram is a Kannoj Brahman who come to city of Poona to try his luck and earn his livelyhood. He comes with his wife a young and pretty daughter. He is not an egoist or a proud man. He is not find a good work so, he does a petty work from household chores to [Bhavankhani] to dancing with the women. While working there he comes to contact with Nana and find a favour with him and for his ready with. Nana is pleased and gives him his Necklace. His problem stsrt from there Gulabi the courtesan in whose house. He is working is not ready to let him walk away with the Necklace. but ghashi does not give her and his refusal. She orders her musde men to get Necklace and thrown himout.


         Hungry and without money he comes to the play where the royal favous are being gave on the Brahmins of Poona. he looked around with his hungry eyes, but he doesn't know the ways of poona city. He is held responsible for the pick pocketing and is further insulted, kicked and thrown out by the soldiers. The Brahmins of Poona and the soldiers are insulted him and kicked him. He is very insulted and for that he takes a vow that he will return. One day convert the city of Poona into the kingdom of pigs and will spare none.
              A dramatic transformation occurs him . He realize the lust of Nana for young girls and learns that Nana had fallen for his daughter. He dramatic circumstances promises to get he for having one enjoyed Gauri his daughter. Nana becomes blinds to her but Ghashi steps in bargaining mood. He refuses to allow his daughter to go to him for the fears of social stigma.


              Ghashiram is a changed man now he used his daughter Gauri for getting kotwalship of Poona and he force to Nana to field to him. After that Ghashiram thaught that when one time he gets power of kotwal. He disallowed Gauri to go to Nana and N ana unable to know what Ghashi wants. Ghashiram is blindly madly goes the bad path with take a revenge with Poona's people.


             Ghashiram pours out his revenge on the city of poona by a lot of bloodletting, false cases and threats. He punished people's of Poona very badly because he take revenge. He brings about a life of permit in the city of Poona. The fear of Ghashi is rewarded in the Brahmans began to creating stooped. Here the one situation is take place
             "Gauri orders,
              Nana does,
              Ghashiram rules"  



However Ghashiram fails to understand the true face of Nana. He has totally misunderstood him. He becomes a play in the hand of Nana who has apponting him to the kotwalship of the city. He is totally don't know because he has get a key post and take a revenge with people of Poona. Such a man cannot join the revolt against him with other people in the first place and they will never trust him because he is an outsider. The Poona will be scared even and he could one day come out in open revolt against him Ghashiram take this post by helping with her daughter. But when he go into the marriage of Nana he know that his daughter has been died and he loose her daughter.


                  For the first time after being deputed the kotwal Ghashiram is weeping like a child and removing the dust from the grave to have her glimpse. The animal in him dies and he is overflowerd with emotion. He told chandra of whose hand she died the human in him lives for a short period and he went to Nana's house and asked him why did he do it but Nana told him th eleddon of Bhagwat Geeta on the nature of death. And told that he had a power of kotwalship and nobody gossip about Gauri.


            Deeply suddened by her death and armed with a new weapen, Ghasiram spills blood and butchery over the city of Poona. The people become dry with fear he once again becomes an instrument to play with in the hunds of Nana. When once time Maratha Sardar knows and show that a few Brahmans in the narrow cell and some of them die of saffocation in the narrow cell. The sardar reports the matter of Peshwa and manage to gather crowd. When it comes to him own head, Nana signs the death warrant of Ghashi with as much of ease and in differentce with which he had signed the order to depute him kotwal.
           

  However, he is remorseful for 
spoiling the life of his daughter. He still calls the Brahmans coward who are scared of him even when his hand is tied.
               Like his daughter he is also used and absued by Nana. A question that up is,
     "Does one human being
     have such enormous
     power over the othe?"
 
"Hit me, beat me,
beat me some more hit me"